As the Culture on the presence of trans athletes in America’s sports world women’s game is closed in war, this year’s super bowl advertisement slate became a battleground.
In particular, two advertisements attracted the Ire of many people who advocate women athletes from trans inclusion.
An advertisement that attracted resentment was directly from NFL and claimed one of the longest lasting time of the whole night. The league’s “Lev the Past behind” place, which aims to promote the spread of the flag football of girls in more high schools across the country, some angered a female flag football player’s male players with a better performance.
Click here for more sports coverage at foxnews.com
Many critics raised the issue with commercial to promote the imagination of women who compete equally and more than equally and better men. The notion that female athletes are not in physical damage compared to their male counterparts, often used in arguments that promote trans inclusion in women’s games.
The women’s advocacy group “women are real” slammed the advertisement to promote that perception in an answer on X.
“I hate this advertisement with all my heart. We know that we cannot compete against a team of men. It’s a lie. And it is a slap on every unprecedented female athlete’s face. Women’s excellence is about it. “The X account of the Advockey Group wrote, and later posted more answers.
“Support your daughter’s development as a female athlete. Don’t compare her to boys. It will only discourage her. This advertisement is a lie that acts as a slap in front of all hardworking female athletes. Women of women. Sports are about female excellence.
Marshi Smith, co-founder of the Legal Advocacy Group The Independent Council on Woman Sports, called NFL in her post on X for her advertisement.
“Why is the world obsessed with showing women playing against men?” Smith wrote. “Give us your [God d—] Stop game and comparing us. ,
Casey Caston, founder of marriage-counseling website Marriage 365, criticized the advertisement for showing “unrealistic” imagery.
“I love women’s game, but it is completely unrealistic and disrespect of gender differences,” Caston wrote on X, later adding, “women who are not made to do everything that are made to do everything Can do it.
Nevertheless, commercials were praised by other social media users, who were trying to spread the flag football of girls in other schools.
Other commercial nikes, who angered the advocates who opposed the trans engine, came from the nike, but for a deep sitting reason.
Sportswear Jugrant started its first Super Bowl Commercial in 27 years, including a star-stodged lineup of women athletes, including Ketleen Clarke, Shakari Richardson, Jordan Chiles and Juju Watkins.
However, many critics were hurried to call Nike to support their official company to support trans athletes who compete in women’s games.
Former NCAA swimmer and current orthodox worker relay Gains slammed Nike’s advertisement, while the same breath promoted startup sportswear advertisement XX-xy athletics, which is in active apparel Most
XX-xy athletics looks to redefine the mainstream in 2025, women’s game stars are monitored
“Ditch Nike supports XX-Xy athletics,” Gaines has written in a share of commercials on X. Gaines. XX-Xy is the first brand ambassador for athletics.
Jennifer Sei, the founder of the Startup Company, former US gymnast and Levi executive Jennifer Sei, also called Nike for AD, while promoting his own brand in a series of positions on X.
“You are filled with it. Only one thing female athletes are told that they cannot, stand for the integrity of their game, to keep men out of women’s game. Litely, it is only one. The thing is, “Sei has written. “Response to commercial on X.
Famous Sports Broadcaster and journalist Mitchell Tafoya also called Nike, while a series of posts on X promoted Sei’s brand.
“Nike is too late in this party. And he is trapped in conservative language about 25 years ago,” Tafoya said, “Later,” What is the waste of the advertisement dollar. ”
Data suggests that the vast majority of Americans, including most democrats, are opposed to allowing trans athletes to compete in women and girls’ games.
Click here to get Fox News app
recently New York Times/Ipsos Survey Most Americans, including most democrats, were found, it does not seem that transgender athletes should be allowed to compete in women’s game. Of the 2,128 people, 79% said that organic men who identify women as women should not be allowed to participate in women’s sports.
Of the 1,025 people who identified as Democrats or Tilt Democrats, 67% stated that transgender athletes should not be allowed to compete with women.
About 70% of Americans say that organic men should not be allowed to compete in women’s games, according to A Gallop pole Last year.
In June, a survey Operated by NORC at the University of Chicago When asked by the respondents, whether transgender athletes of both sexes should be allowed to participate in the sports league that suit their favorite gender identity rather than their biological sex. In that survey, 65% replied that it should never be allowed or rarely allowed. When they were asked about competing in women’s game, especially when they were asked about adult transgender women athletes, 69% opposed it.
President Donald Trump recently carried out executive action to address the issue, signed “No Men in Women Sports” on 5 February.
However, some states have indicated that they will refuse to follow the order and continue to allow biological men to participate and share in the locker room with women athletes including California and Minnesota.
Follow Fox News Digital Game coverage on x, More membership Fox News Sports Hodl Newsletter,
