London: Prince Harry on Friday lost his legal challenge to change the security system by the British government after his decision to withdraw from royal duties with his American wife Meghan.
Harry, the younger son of King Charles, demanded a reversal of a decision by the home office – the ministry responsible for policing – who decided in February 2020 that he would not automatically receive individual police protection while living in Britain.
Last year, the High Court ruled by the High Court in London and the decision was taken by three senior appeal judges, who said that, while Harry was intelligently felt that there was no amount for law error in the decision.
Judge Jeffrey Vose said that Harry’s lawyer had made “powerful and moving arguments” about the impact of the decision on his safety.
He said, “It was clear that the Duke of Sussex treated badly by the system, but I conclude – studied the expansion of comprehensive documentation – I could not say that Duke’s complaint complaints translated into a legal argument for the challenge of Ravic’s decision,” he told the court.
The 40 -year -old Harry, who now lives in California with Meghan and his two children, attended the two -day hearing in the person in April, when his lawyer told the court that he was taken out for a separate, unfair and inferior treatment.
His lawyers stated that Al Qaeda recently invited him to assassinate him, and his American wife Meghan was involved in “chasing a dangerous car with Paprazi in New York City in 2023”.
“Nobody should forget the human dimension in this case: a person is sitting behind me, whose safety, whose safety and whose life is at stake, his lawyer Shaheed Fatima told the court that Harry saw.
He said, “His presence during this appeal is a powerful illustration, one needed, how much this appeal meant to him and his family,” he said.
However, the government’s legal team said that the Bispoke system for the Duke of Sussex Harry had a positive benefit from the point of view of safety evaluation.
